Pages

Showing posts with label Islamic jurisprudence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic jurisprudence. Show all posts

Riffat Hassan's "Equal before Allah?"

Hassan, Riffat. "Equal before Allah? Woman-Man Equality in the Islamic Tradition," in Harvard Divinity Bulletin 17/2 (1987). 

Riffat Hassan is a Pakistani-American theologian and scholar on the Quran. She received her PhD from Durham University in Islamic Philosophy in 1968 and has taught in many institutions, including Oklahoma State University and Harvard University. She is currently a professor at the University of Louisville.

In her feminist theological study of women’s position in Islam, Riffat Hassan states that in spite of the fact that early Islam witnessed the involvement of significant women like Aisha and Khadija (the Prophet’s wives) and Rabia al-Basri (an outstanding Sufi woman), Islam has remained a patriarchal domain even until today. Patriarchal figures have traditionally defined for women their roles and status. While Muslim women have historically accepted this until recently, Hassan observes, many of them are now standing up because they realize that Islam is being used to oppress them rather than to liberate them. Comparing Christian and Jewish scriptures to hadith narrations that pertain to women, Hassan finds strong resemblances among the three, the most important of which concerns the subjugation of women. Hassan makes a strong appeal to Muslims to more humane and feminist interpretations of Islam for the sake of a healthier global Muslim community.
reade more... Résuméabuiyad

Imagine You Are a Jurist

I promised to share here what my last essay-assignment was. After this, I'll share the ones before that! All have been quite stimulating so far, and I'm looking forward to the future ones as well.

So, during the last  couple of weeks, we've been reading texts on Islamic jurisprudence and sexual ethics. We were heading towards Muslim jurists' views on conception and abortion, the laws on what a woman should do in various scenarios. Before that, our professor had us imagine that we, the students, are jurists in the medieval times and a good, practicing Muslim woman comes to us and asks if premature withdrawal is permissible or not because she and her husband are poor and have several children, and she does not think they should have anymore because they cannot afford them. Her husband claims premature withdrawal is the best method of preventing pregnancy and that using condoms (made of cured sheep's intestine) are forbidden according to Islam. So, she wants to know if it's Islamically acceptable to use condoms and whether or not premature withdrawal is allowed.

We give a response based on Islam (the Quran, hadiths, and jurists' opinions). Some time passes, and she comes back, unhappy, saying that she followed our advice but just found out that she is 2.5 months pregnant. She asks us 1) if she can have an abortion, and 2) if yes, then does she need her husband's permission?

SO! Exciting stuff! And everything we said was to be supported by the Quran, hadiths, and other jurists' opinions, which means we couldn't say, "No, of course you can do XYZ! Who said you can't?" etc... which is where one of the main challenges lies in being a jurist, I see now.

We were not allowed to read up on abortion and conception in Islam, save for the material he sent us that we could use to make our decision. In the next blog post, I will share what all those are -- ranging from Quranic verses to hadith reports to jurists' statements.

reade more... Résuméabuiyad